BOOM! TOUGH ACTIN TINACTIN.
This card isn't good, if it was 0 fate I think it would see some play, debuffs are good. Its just to clunky.
Search found 124 matches
- Mon Jan 06, 2020 1:35 pm
- Forum: Seekers of Wisdom
- Topic: Wildfire Kick (Dragon Event)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3479
- Mon Jan 06, 2020 1:33 pm
- Forum: Seekers of Wisdom
- Topic: Iron Foundations Stance (Dragon Event)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3661
Re: Iron Foundations Stance (Dragon Event)
I like the art, I like the immunity, I like the cost, I like the card draw. The downside is of course the need to play a Kiho before you can play it. It works best with some amount of Mantra and or Actions that produce Pocket Actions. Its an OK card.
- Mon Jan 06, 2020 1:30 pm
- Forum: Seekers of Wisdom
- Topic: Niten (Dragon Attachment)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3648
Re: Niten (Dragon Attachment)
I think this is another sleeper in the pack, and I think its being underrated because of deck bias and group think. Dragon players need to get out of this mindset of waiting for someone to show up and build them a deck that will lift of the floor where they are lying in a pool of self pity. This in ...
- Mon Jan 06, 2020 1:23 pm
- Forum: Seekers of Wisdom
- Topic: An Ocean In A Drop (Dragon Attachment)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3563
Re: An Ocean In A Drop (Dragon Attachment)
Probably my favorite card in the pack, for starters the art is phenomenal. 1 fate to let me dump my opponents hand full of stuff that is going to hurt me, or 1 fate to dig for a better card, I will take it. This card is being slept on by so many people, it should be seeing way more play in Dragon an...
- Mon Jan 06, 2020 1:21 pm
- Forum: Seekers of Wisdom
- Topic: Togashi Acolyte (Dragon Conflict Character)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3587
Re: Togashi Acolyte (Dragon Conflict Character)
He can react to himself being attached to someone. Thats something. He isn't good enough to play as a character, and the ability isn't good enough to pay 2 fate for. Also he doesn't work with the Holding that acts as if you played an extra card. You think there would have been some synergy but no.
- Mon Jan 06, 2020 1:20 pm
- Forum: Seekers of Wisdom
- Topic: Shintao Monastery (Dragon Holding)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3586
Re: Shintao Monastery (Dragon Holding)
Its a holding that needs a certain deck, but that deck isn't a thing yet, I'm not sure it ever comes out the card storage solution of your choice.
- Mon Jan 06, 2020 1:18 pm
- Forum: Seekers of Wisdom
- Topic: Togashi Mitsu (Dragon Character)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3516
Re: Togashi Mitsu (Dragon Character)
Mitsu is a big old pile of stats, and can't be hit with covert, and has some bomb ass art. The action is really strong, it has a cost, but ring effects are good. This is a card worth running, he has everything you want, its a fantastic card. The problem with Mitsu is the other Mitsu.
- Mon Jan 06, 2020 1:15 pm
- Forum: Seekers of Wisdom
- Topic: Monastery Protector (Dragon Character)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3640
Re: Monastery Protector (Dragon Character)
Monastery Protector needs a deck type to really shine, a deck with Tattooed people, so that makes her average, but what makes her above average even if you don't have an entire deck of Tattooed people and only a few, Her text is a cost that they have to pay, can't pay can't play. This is way better ...
- Mon Jan 06, 2020 1:12 pm
- Forum: Seekers of Wisdom
- Topic: Mirumoto Masashige (Dragon Character)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3597
Re: Mirumoto Masashige (Dragon Character)
Dragon likes small boards, Masashige likes small boards. He has 9 stats points and a fairly easy self honor effect, he is a good 4 drop that can pump your board each turn. I think he is a good inclusion in most decks that aren't trying to go wide. For more information about Masashige's you can look ...
- Mon Jan 06, 2020 1:06 pm
- Forum: Seekers of Wisdom
- Topic: Perceptive Kitsuki (Dragon Character)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3584
Re: Perceptive Kitsuki (Dragon Character)
Its got decent stats, dragon don't have a lot of ways to honor but they have a few. Hand Knowledge is good, but you have to have won a conflict already, and you are putting the ring back into the unclaimed pool. Chances are if I wanted the ring the first conflict I did, I probably still want it if I...